v379 · surgical institutional component
Evidence Map
The controlled map of field, remote, operational and financial evidence lanes that precedes verification, assurance closure and export.
Evidence Map diagram
Evidence lanes
Field evidenceVisits, photos, plots, assets, actors, practices and outcomes captured with identity, time and location context.
Remote evidenceSatellite, GIS, eDNA, models and external datasets attached as evidence objects, not final decisions.
Operational / financial evidenceMilestones, tasks, budgets, tranches, documents and release conditions routed into review.
Admissibility criteria
| Criterion | Required posture | Reviewer test |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness | Required evidence objects are present and mapped to claims. | Check missing lanes and required artefacts. |
| Coherence | Evidence, programme context and attribution do not contradict one another. | Check conflict flags, overrides and rationale. |
| Attribution | Actor, method, site, time and claim pathway remain attached. | Trace claim to source evidence and accountable role. |
| Reliance readiness | Evidence can move into verification, locking and assurance room review. | Confirm export is not triggered before closure. |
Contained vs excluded
| Contained | Excluded |
|---|---|
| Evidence categories, lineage expectations, admissibility criteria and reviewer route. | Live protected records, private logs, reviewer notes, operator records or committee decisions. |
| Public orientation for minimum evidence requests and protected walkthrough preparation. | Approval, finance, rating, certification or replacement of institutional judgement. |