This protected matrix links donor readiness claims to evidence objects, safeguards, MRV lineage, sovereignty posture, database readiness visibility, and reviewer accountability.
This matrix shows how governance claims connect to protected artifacts, evidence objects, reviewer accountability, MRV lineage, and export posture. It is a documentation surface only; it does not query live data or create new workflow logic.
| Readiness area | Evidence object / control | Reviewer question | Protected artifact | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk assurance | Risk posture, residual-risk statement, reviewer controls, escalation logic. | Can risk claims be tested without relying on marketing language? | Risk Assurance Note | Indexed |
| Safeguards | Safeguards records, grievance evidence, consultation records, compliance mappings. | Are safeguards attached to evidence and escalation rather than detached policy text? | Safeguards & Compliance Framework | Indexed |
| MRV attachment | Methodology, indicator, baseline, evidence object, verification logic, reporting output. | Does the Hub attach to national MRV authority without replacing it? | MRV Attachment & Indicator Lineage | Indexed |
| Sovereignty | Hosting region, residency constraints, export controls, retention, institutional ownership. | Can deployment be governed within jurisdictional and institutional boundaries? | Data Sovereignty & Hosting Configuration | Indexed |
| Database readiness | Staging-first SQL, RLS checks, indexes, pooling, PITR, monitoring, load testing, jobs. | Are production controls visible without executing SQL here? | Database Readiness Note | Visible only |
| Reviewer accountability | Resistance triggers, reviewer attribution, escalation timers, resolution requirements. | Can stalling, reinterpretation, unsupported rejection, and authorization drift be surfaced? | Resistance Routing Note | Added |
| Submission readiness | Pack status, linked artifacts, owner sign-off needs, final readiness posture. | Can the donor pack be reviewed as a coherent submission surface? | Submission Status Overview | Added |
The matrix ties together methodological authority, source evidence, reviewer interpretation, escalation history, database readiness visibility, and donor pack exports. The purpose is to let reviewers test the chain rather than accept claims at face value.
Stalled reviews, interpretation conflicts, unsupported variances, and authorization drift are treated as case types that can be routed, measured, resolved, and assigned final accountability.