Evidence Intake
The system assembles evidence from FieldTrace, land registries, ownership records and transaction data. No self-reported ESG claims are used.
Stewardship Benchmarking
A governed institutional surface inside Terra Vita Hub that reconstructs how capital behaves on land. It is a reviewer route, not a dashboard, score, rating engine, certification route or investment-advice layer.
No ratingsNo certificationNo investment adviceNo regulatory substitution
40-second public surface
Capital behaviour on land, reconstructed through governed evidence.
Stewardship Benchmarking is a governed institutional surface inside Terra Vita Hub that reconstructs how capital behaves on land. It does not rate, certify or approve investors. Instead, it provides ministries, DFIs, land-use authorities and programme owners with reviewer-grade transparency on the real-world effects of investment behaviour.
The module connects field-level evidence from FieldTrace with ownership structures, land-use change, transaction patterns and stewardship commitments, then routes this evidence through a canonical reviewer process. The result is a clear, attributable reconstruction of land behaviour, capital behaviour, farmer-impact behaviour and ecological outcomes.
All outputs are evidence-bound, reviewer-traceable and aligned with the governance spine. They support oversight, policy design and institutional due diligence without substituting regulatory authority or issuing scores.
Exact Hub placement
Governance Spine → Institutional Review Surfaces → Stewardship Benchmarking.
Stewardship Benchmarking belongs in the Hub because it is institutional, reviewer-bound and transparency-oriented. FieldTrace contributes bottom-of-system evidence; Terra Vita Hub performs attribution, route governance, reviewer assessment, export posture and institutional transparency.
Public Governance Front Door
Evidence Mapping
Programme Review
Register Reconstruction
Funding Posture
Stewardship Benchmarking
Governance Spine
Reviewer Route
Deployments
Canonical reviewer route
Benchmarking is turned into a reviewable institutional process.
Attribution & Identity Reconstruction
Evidence is attributed to the correct fund, vehicle, beneficial owner and land parcel. Stewardship commitments are linked to corresponding evidence.
Behaviour Reconstruction
The system reconstructs actual behaviour across land, capital, farmer impact and ecology. Reconstruction remains evidence-bound and reviewer-traceable.
Reviewer Assessment
Reviewers assess reconstructed behaviour, identify deviations and record governance notes. No ratings or scores are issued.
Benchmark Output
The system produces governed baselines and comparative outputs for institutional use. Outputs do not substitute regulatory authority.
Hub UI structure
Minimal reviewer-grade module surface.
Overview
- What this module does
- What counts as evidence
- Authority boundaries
- Reviewer route
- Export posture
Evidence Intake
- Land-use change
- Ecological indicators
- Ownership structures
- Transaction histories
- Holding periods
- Displacement effects
- Generational transition impacts
Attribution & Identity Reconstruction
- Fund identity
- Vehicle identity
- Beneficial ownership
- Stewardship commitments
- Parcel-level linkage
Behaviour Reconstruction
- Land behaviour
- Capital behaviour
- Farmer-impact behaviour
- Ecological behaviour
- Deviations from commitments
Reviewer Assessment
- Evidence view
- Attribution view
- Behaviour reconstruction
- Reviewer notes
- Governance flags
- Decision log
Benchmark Outputs
- Fund-level baselines
- Region-level comparisons
- Land-use-type comparisons
- Transition-pathway comparisons
- Export-register alignment
Transparency Layer
- Ownership transparency
- Land-use transparency
- Capital-behaviour transparency
- Stewardship-performance transparency
Evidence model
Evidence is governed from source to reviewer output.
| Route layer | Evidence objects | Governed output |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence Intake | FieldTrace events, registry records, ownership data, transaction history, ecological indicators. | Assembled evidence bundle with source, timestamp and attribution hash. |
| Attribution | Fund, vehicle, beneficial owner, parcel identity and stewardship commitment records. | Identity-bound reconstruction of who owns what and which commitments apply. |
| Behaviour Reconstruction | Land-use shifts, capital behaviour, farmer impacts, ecological signals and deviations. | Evidence-bound reconstruction of actual behaviour across the four canonical dimensions. |
| Reviewer Assessment | Reviewer notes, governance flags and decision log. | Reviewer-traceable assessment without score, rating, certification or approval. |
| Benchmark Output | Baselines, comparison sets and export-register reference. | Institutional transparency output for oversight, policy design and due diligence. |
FieldTrace boundary
FieldTrace remains the evidence engine. The Hub remains the governance engine.
FieldTrace contributes
- Parcel identity
- Timestamped field events
- Ecological indicators
- Land-use change
- Farmer-level practices
The Hub governs
- Attribution and identity reconstruction
- Reviewer routes and authority boundaries
- Behaviour reconstruction
- Benchmark outputs
- Institutional transparency and export alignment