Institutional journey

Keep the route simple: understand the environment, walk through the model, share the review pack, then enter diligence only when the right team is ready.

TV-CRI flagship

TV‑CRI turns field complexity into comparable, explainable institutional signals.

TV‑CRI is the governed intelligence layer inside Terra Vita Hub. It combines field evidence, institutional workflows, and satellite-derived indicators such as NDVI to produce facility-level signals that committees can challenge, approve, and defend.

What TV-CRI does

Explainable signals, not black-box scores

TV‑CRI does not replace institutional judgment. It structures evidence into comparable signals so lenders, DFIs, funds, and sustainability teams can make defensible decisions under scrutiny.

Field evidenceDocuments, partner inputs, and facility records.
Satellite evidenceImagery-backed indicators such as NDVI strengthen independent monitoring.
CalibrationSignals are normalized into comparable facility-level indicators.
Decision supportCommittees receive evidence-linked outputs and flagged anomalies.
AuditabilityMethods, thresholds, alerts, and overrides remain visible.
Why it matters

Independent evidence

Satellite-backed indicators help validate field reality, strengthen monitoring, and reduce reliance on narrative reporting alone.

How it appears

Facility-level outputs

Latest NDVI, baseline, delta, anomaly score, and open alert state can now surface in the hub through the satellite evidence layer.

Institutional comfort

Reviewable by design

Satellite-derived signals remain explainable, threshold-based, and challengeable by human reviewers.

Homepage governance alignment

TV-CRI inherits the Terra Vita governance spine.

This module reflects the homepage position: Terra Vita Hub is governance infrastructure, not a dashboard. Evidence intake, reviewer action, MRV attachment, escalation, audit reconstruction, and export posture remain connected inside one governed decision environment.

Governance roleProvides calibrated intelligence for institutional review without becoming a black-box decision-maker.
Evidence-to-decision chainSignals, evidence, interpretation, reviewer action, MRV posture, escalation, and export readiness remain connected.
Reviewer accountabilityHuman reviewers remain accountable for interpretation, conditions, overrides, and final decisions.
MRV attachmentTV-CRI supports calibration and risk interpretation while preserving MRV methodology, evidence lineage, and reviewer reviewability.
Data sovereignty & accessRisk signals and calibration outputs remain governed by context, access policy, and export posture.
Audit & export postureTV-CRI outputs remain explainable and replayable as part of the wider evidence-to-decision chain.
Lifecycle logicIntelligence supports intake, review, escalation, monitoring, verification, and closeout stages.
Cross-sector invariantCalibration can vary by sector; governance, reviewer accountability, and audit logic remain constant.
Evidence intakeReviewer actionMRV attachmentEscalationAudit reconstructionExport posture

Intelligence layer next step

Review how TV-CRI supports governed interpretation, then return to the platform journey.

TV-CRI should be legible as an intelligence layer inside the governed system, not as a disconnected analytics product.

Reconnect intelligence to governance

Move back to platform and governance pages when the question is how calibrated signals inform accountable decisions.

Use TV-CRI in sector context

Review environments and sectors when the team wants to see where TV-CRI supports delivery in practice.

Move into guided review

Book a walkthrough when the institution wants the intelligence layer explained against a full decision flow.