Terra Vita Hub v517 · Reviewer Collaboration Rooms

Reviewer Collaboration Rooms

Named reviewers can discuss exact programme, document, evidence, FieldTrace, review, release and audit records while formal governance outcomes remain controlled by the existing Review Ledger.

Programme or project

Authority boundary. A comment, consensus indicator, resolved thread or closed round is not a formal review outcome. Collaboration cannot approve a programme, accept evidence, determine admissibility, authorise funding, certify an outcome or create institutional reliance.

Preparing protected reviewer collaboration room…

Programme Collaboration Room

Loading programme…

Current room postureReconstructing

Formal governance remains separateDiscussion ≠ Decision

Resolve collaboration items here, then record any authoritative review outcome through the Document Review Ledger.

Programme	Reviewers	Open	Evidence requests	Overdue	Disagreement	Formal pending	Unread

Named Participation

Reviewers and room roles

Membership controls participation context; it does not expand a reviewer’s formal authority.

Bounded Review Cadence

Review rounds

First review, response, reconsideration and closure remain visible as distinct collaboration stages.

Record-linked Collaboration

Create a finding, question, request or discussion

Every item remains attributable to a named reviewer and exact target.

Open Findings

Unresolved findings and assigned actions

Evidence Requests

Evidence or response still required

Document Discussions

Discussion attached to governed documents

FieldTrace Discussions

Discussion attached to field evidence

Open FieldTrace Intelligence

Formal Record Boundary

Resolved collaboration awaiting formal review record

Record formal outcome

Resolved and Closed

Preserved collaboration history

Attributable Audit History

Collaboration and formal-review chronology

View machine-readable collaboration room